Zum Inhalt springen
uencoder

Verwenden XPath in Abfrage XML Dokumente

XPath navigates XML trees mit path expressions, predicates, und Funktionen. Lernen absolute und relative paths, wildcards, und gemein Funktionen.

  1. 1

    XPath expressions select nodes from an XML tree: /root/child selects all child elements, //element selects anywhere, [@attr="value"] filters by attribute, text() extracts text content, * is a wildcard. XPath 1.0 is universally supported; XPath 2.0+ adds typing and more functions.

  2. 2
    JSONPath-Abfrage →

    Use JSONPath (the JSON equivalent of XPath) to query JSON converted from XML. First convert XML to JSON, then use JSONPath expressions like $.root.child[?(@.attr=="value")]. This is a two-step alternative to direct XPath.

  3. 3
    XML-Formatierer →

    Formatieren the XML to understand its structure before writing XPath expressions. Indentation reveals the hierarchy, making it easier to construct correct paths. Verify your XPath by checking which nodes it selects.

  4. 4

    Common XPath patterns: /bookstore/book[1] (first book), /bookstore/book[price>35] (filter by child value), //title (all titles anywhere), count(//book) (count books), //book/@category (attribute values). Use predicates [...] for filtering and functions like text(), contains(), starts-with().

Häufige Fragen

XPath vs CSS selectors?
CSS selectors work on HTML/XML elements (simpler, limited). XPath is more powerful: can select by text content, use functions, navigate to parent/ancestor, and handle namespaces. Use CSS selectors for simple HTML queries; use XPath for complex XML or when CSS is insufficient.
XPath 1.0 vs 2.0 vs 3.0?
XPath 1.0 is universally supported (browsers, libxml). XPath 2.0 adds sequences, richer type system, more functions — supported by Saxon. XPath 3.0 adds dynamic evaluation. For web/browser use, stick with 1.0. For server-side XML processing with Saxon, use 2.0+.

Workflows, die diese Aufgabe lösen

Verwandte Tools